Rethinking Initiative, and gotta work on a summary

So the original idea of initiative was to track both player turn order and position to monster for targeting. This was rolled at the beginning of combat and players had to adjust from there. But if I'm going to have Fitness abilities to be able to adjust, and in such a way require certain levels of initiative, then why roll in the beginning? I could now just decide to incorporate initiative into the combat system, have spells have a penalty, maybe a kind of penalty for certain spells. But initiative was a relative position from the monster, not an absolute one, so an initiative of 1, the furthest from the monster, could still be within arm's reach, just behind the other players.

Course now this brings up the question of battlefield mobility. Since the monster targets enemies with both fixed and relative positions, players can feasibly dodge moves with something that could move them about. But do I make movement core or ability card based. I could tie it to the action energy cards, but these energy cards are an easy catch all for everything that may be too general to throw into randomly collected abilities. This means too many mechanics in one place, and that I think is bad design. Course, I should first figure out what they're currently being used for to see if I declare it overburdened.

So far Action energy is used for

• Shuffling discard pile into the deck while out of combat and at home. 
• Discard and draw hand while out of combat and at home.
• Use in special attacks. 
• Draw a card at any time during your turn, or any time while out of combat. Can be modified by different skill cards to perform this differently. 

With this in mind, I am considering having initiative being set versus randomly rolled at the beginning of combat. D&D rolled for initiative purely for turn order, and was more or less set for an entire encounter. If I have players that are suppose to be mobile, then they need to be able to dictate that movement a bit more. But then if its going to be key, then it needs to interact with the player more than just order and targeting. Namely in their abilities. But THEN that's just more restrictions on card use, and that sounds like it will narrow gameplay. 

Sitting on this more.

Another thing is I probably should get to writing a one page summary for the "about" page, cause no one is going to bother reading my mind nor my posts just to get an idea of what my game is. I think I can go with "Deck building Themed card combat board game."

Fitness Card Idea and then other junk

Finally decided fitness attacks are going to be fighting game style chain attacks. Each fitness attack ability would have a classification: light medium, heavy, jump, and knock-up. Each attack can be used on its own, or can be stacked in a certain order for bonus effects. Each attack will also have an initiative requirement to perform, and some attacks will change your current initiative.

The core of this idea is the light > medium > heavy combo concept. On their own, each attack has a base damage. When chained with the proper attack by being used in a sequence, a secondary effect takes place. For 1 star attack, its a bit of extra damage. For more advanced moves, like a leg sweep, it can disable the enemy for one move. In this case it just removes one die from the enemy's attack.

Tier 3 abilities would be like supers with a failure rate that can be mitigated with the right chain attack.

Social I think I'll create these catagories:

Enhancements: cards that buff individual abilities.

Trainers: You take time out of combat to gain ranks with a trainer. Each rank grants a new ability to use with this card.

Companions: These act like a normal ability that are played and tapped.

Instants: Played from hand spells that can happen at any time.

Items: I guess I'll need this slot if Bento heal kits are going to stay social cards.

So far I got sorcery spells for int. Played from hand. Have other cards play up that style.

Gonna go from here.

Social is just going to be Green

Easy design decision: Make social decks act like Green decks, or at least the green starter deck I got, which was a mix of powerful creatures and buff enchants. So running with that.

What to do about Social

So I had good ideas of what Fitness and Int abilities should be like. (Fitness are creatures and Int are spells). Social originally was buffs and companions, but that feels like its viability as a single color deck was shot.

Another bit was some companions were also tied to specific events, but when if a player gets the card not as a social energy build, then that card is worthless.

How about have these events grant either the companion or an equilvalent tier item. So like my military companion social card was someone that could call in a mortar strike. Others could get a weapon or attack for fitness or Int based equipment.

I need to write more down.

Card Draw Solution

Just came up with an interesting way to add more card draws: make the card draw a core ability with action energy, base 1 card per draw, and have each other type of draw be an enhancement to that draw ability. This would add a more reliable way to have card drawing in combat other than having to stack card draw abilities. Other abilities will still maintain a tap or discard strength use. Also when in town every time as player draws an event with an action energy the player can also draw a card. Maybe give a bonus if they don't.

Also had more thoughts on the villain deck. Might change the draw from 3 to 2. With a 60 card deck that's a difference of 10 turns. Buy that will have to come down to play testing.

And that requires something to test.

More Card Thoughts

Post for the sake of post. Cause if I don't I don't post anyway.

Got the villain deck card numbers hashed out. One thing I think would be an issue is as more plots are performed, the fewer plots are there to draw from. I also have nothing planned for when a villain deck runs out, nor how fast it would possibly occur. Considering one rule is that the villain's hand is never really discarded, only spent cards would enter some sort of graveyard, and unused cards will show up in the hand eventually, though like solitaire, there can be a sequence of a stack that cannot move given how the type of combinations, which leads to a standstill. Don't want that happening.

Another thought is how do I want social to play out? There were buffs, but buffs don't win fights. I had the idea of "mentor" companions, that during the board phase you build them up by spending actions on them, and you then unlock abilities based on how often you visited them. This gives Social cards a type of attack that's companion based rather than ability based. Of course what kind of disparity should this ability be with others?

Another thought are marking attacks. Basically subsequent attacks on the same target gain some kind of benefit. But that is just a fancy attack. Sync was the other idea. Attach to another ability being played, perform that ability alongside. This all really plays into how do I want decks to be built? If I think in terms of MtG decks, those are usually single color, because you don't want to run into the issue of drawing the energy you don't need at any given time, and homogeneity makes sure that doesn't happen. But if I'm thinking of Fit/Int/Social energy as stats rather than energy, that means a character is rather a mix of these three energies, which for one makes the starting deck awkward. If energy is being cycled into the deck, then that adds the risk of getting cards you don't need. But do I want players to always build a mix of cards from all three types, or allow single color decks to survive? Or do something where all cards have a colorless use and a bonus if the right energy is used.

Anyway more posting to come later so more thoughts can get down.

Just spent the whole day randomly writing this thing. Huh.

Doing Some Combat Revisions.

I just realized I had an idea of combat but no concrete rules. Course this all has to then tie to how cards are designed and played.

This includes what can I do to make the game more deck-buildy and have the player cycle more cards, having some use for Action Energy early game, cause they were originally regulated to special attacks, which were end game cards, and now I want to rethink what does initiative really mean? Originally this was position from monsters, with 6 being the closest, and 1 being the furthest. But then do I really want to separate melee from ranged? I think not, because this is also a randomly generated position, so sucks to find yourself in a place where your abilities don't work.

So far it's this

1. I can have the energy cards play as a "tap again" general purpose for any ability, namely the basic abilities. This is suppose to work in conjunction with another idea to move cards which was "discard an ability after it has been tapped to play that ability again." Problem is this is a multiplier effect, and multiplier effects do that high curve growth so once stronger cards are out will be a problem to balance for. 
2. So one of my tier 1 cards is an "attack" fitness card. But one of my tier 1 int card is a "blast" card. As is they're both a basic attack, so I need a way to separate the two. One thing could be "Attack" is a permanent ability while "Blast" is more like a one off spell. Of that then that would put "Attack" at base damage 1 and "Blast" at base damage 2 to compensate. The other idea was they were bother permanent abilities, but Attack required you to adjust your initiative up 2 after you used it, like running up to attack a target and then backing off. 
3. Still need to expand on the role of Social cards. As is they're support cards, buffs and healing. One thing social energy was suppose to handle were companions. But companions are, or should be, minimum tier 2 (of 3) cards. This turns to the question "How mixed should players make their decks." If a pure social deck can't handle tier 1 combat its not good. 

More stuff to come, we'll see if I remember to post it.